SEEing is Believing

I said a few posts ago that to be able to SEE what's really going on in the world today, one must first wake up to the fact that we are imprisoned by a Matrix that serves a purpose. But who, or what, controls this Matrix? Who are the Architects? Who is enslaving us? And, perhaps more importantly, why? In the next several posts, I'll post some observations that might give some clues to the answers to these questions.

Let's start here in the U.S., although I don't believe the Architects are strictly U.S.-based -- they're all over the world -- but the U.S. seems to be the hotbed headquarters for the current plan. It is quite clear to a good number of us now that our government has lied to us about many things to further its own hidden agenda. Let's see, where shall I start?

I gave the example in the last post about there being no weapons of mass destruction, which was the key justification for King George's plan to invade Iraq, but let's go deeper into the rabbit hole, Alice. Let's go to the root event that allowed the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, will likely allow the invasion of Iran, Syria, and North Korea, and prompted the entire "war on terror." That event was, of course, 9/11.

Most of us watched in horror as the second tower was hit by a passenger plane, then we reeled with disbelief as both towers collapsed, right before our very eyes. Over and over again, we watched it happen, as the news media inundated us with these images (repetition while in a state of shock is a very effective mind-control technique). Before the morning was done, we were told that a plane had also hit the Pentagon and one was downed in a Pennsylvania field.

Almost immediately and without any kind of investigation whatsoever, we were being told that Al-Qaeda was responsible for the dastardly plan. We were told that 19 hijackers of Middle Eastern descent had piloted the planes that did the damage. And were told it over and over again.

Now, there are some fairly obvious questions surrounding the government's story, none of which were addressed by the supposed 9/11 Commission, which only served to tighten the intelligence controls on the U.S., rather than get to the real perpetrators.

For example, if the heat from the fires in the towers were the cause of their collapse, how is it that the tower hit last was the first to collapse and why have a number of engineers and demolition experts said that they believe the twin towers were demolished? Indeed, it certainly appeared to be a planned demolition, when viewing the sight on live TV.

Or how about this one -- why were some 7 of the 19 hijackers, who were supposedly killed in the attack, reported alive and well by their friends and relatives shortly after 9/11? That was a story squashed quickly. Here's another story that got squelched shortly after 9/11 -- why has the SEC not released the names of the unusually high number of investors who sold short on American Airlines, United Airlines, and the companies who insured the World Trade Center, and why does the investment trail lead back to an ex-CIA director, turned banker?

No, let's just focus on one area where some fairly convincing evidence clearly shows that the Pentagon was not hit by a passenger plane. Watch this flash presentation, called Pentagon Strike, and read this Commentary on the Pentagon Strike, then come back to the rest of this post for more discussion.

SEEing is believing, Alice. When confronted with the facts, the objective reality, it is quite clear that no passenger plane hit the Pentagon. Something hit the Pentagon, but it wasn't a passenger plane. So, if we accept the facts before our very eyes, then we must conclude that our government is lying about the facts surrounding 9/11. And why would they do that? Why would they deliberately participate in a cover-up of the facts of 9/11? Why did the military stand down when they supposedly knew that four planes had been hijacked? Why was our government complicit in killing some 3,500 of its own citizens?

Well, the answer in part can be found in a document prepared by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a right-wing Washington think tank founded in the spring of 1997 by some of the very men who now hold office in King George's court. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle and others, including the King's brother, Jeb Bush, have all been affiliated with this think tank. Four years before 9/11 and three years before the King ascended to the throne in early 2001, PNAC was urging then President Clinton to wage war on Iraq, according to this Philadelophia Daily News story:

"We urge you to... enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world," stated the letter to Clinton, signed by Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and others. "That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime from power." (For full text of the letter, click here.)

When Clinton wouldn't invade, it became clear that more was needed to push their agenda on the world. In September of 2000, a full year before 9/11, PNAC published their comprehensive report on the state of America's military and made recommendations for Rebuilding America's Defenses, a plan that is still being followed almost to the letter by King George and his court. One quote from the report seems eerily prophetic (or planned) in relation to 9/11:

"Further, the process of [military] transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event –like a new Pearl Harbor." (p. 51; italics mine)

Well, 9/11 has certainly been a "catastrophic and catalyzing event," now hasn't it? In fact, it is the very event upon which everything else has been based. This is the big lie at the root of all else that has ensued since King George grabbed power, well, except for the even bigger that he's even in power. This is the lie that threatens our very democracy (see Michael Moore's Farenheit 911 for more on the fraudulent way in which King George came to power in 2,000).

I don't know about you, but I don't think the 2004 election was any more legitimate than the 2000 election, and long live King George for another four years! How lovely to pay my taxes and have them squandered on needless, senseless war, secret intelligence and covert black ops to disrupt whole nations, like Haiti, when the money could have gone to so many other constructive uses here in our own country, like healthcare, arts and education.

I want out, Morpheus. Give me the red pill, please, please...